Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Glenn Smits vs Marlon Vankan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Smits vs Vankan analysis and find out who is favored!
Glenn Smits vs Marlon Vankan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Smits has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Vankan has won 46.35%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Smits, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Vankan has won 51.91%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 33.77% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Smits has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vankan has saved 56.48% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Smits has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Vankan winning 58.46% (W/L 38/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Smits has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 4/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 30% (W/L 3/ 7). Vankan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 114/ 88), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 35% (W/L 9/ 17).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Smits winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Smits winning 2 and Vankan winning 1. The last match between Smits and Vankan was at the M15 Troisdorf, 11-05-2021, Q3, Clay with Glenn Smits getting the victory 3-6 6-4 10-8.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:36:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Smits and Vankan have played a deciding set 1 times, with Smits winning 1 times and Vankan 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Smits winning 0, and Vankan 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Smits has played against opponents with an average rank of while Vankan has played against players with an average rank of 169.62.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Smits has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vankan has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Smits has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vankan has converted 43.1% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Smits 1 - 0 Vankan
Ret.
Rank
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
553
Rank
553
High
23
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
48% (23-25)
Career Total W/L
53% (127-111)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
52% (12-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Glenn Smits | Marlon Vankan |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 19 | 18 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:0 | 1:36:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (42/67) | 67% (49/73) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (32/42) | 65% (32/49) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (12/25) | 67% (16/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 14% (1/7) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 34% (25/73) | 34% (23/67) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-4 10-8 |
Stats 
Glenn Smits
Player
Marlon Vankan
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
8
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
73)
69
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Glenn Smits | Marlon Vankan |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 52% (12/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (28/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 49% (249/260) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (12/11) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 28 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 56 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:53:58 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 131.35 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 67% (1137/1695) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 62% (710/1137) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (259/558) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 43% (75/174) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (660/1615) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 52% (11/10) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (11/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 71% (14/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 29% (14/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 22% (9/2) |
Glenn Smits Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Alessandro Bega
Player
Glenn Smits
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
8
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louis Wessels
Player
Glenn Smits
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Glenn Smits
Player
Marlon Vankan
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
8
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
73)
69
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-4 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 5-7 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 4-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stepan Pecak
Player
Glenn Smits
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexandr Binda
Player
Glenn Smits
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
80)
1
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 7-5 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Glenn Smits
Player
Aleksei Khomich
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
91)
15
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
40 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
0%
(
0 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
16 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(3) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Marlon Vankan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Mika Brunold
Player
Marlon Vankan
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
75 of
108)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
52 of
108)
106
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Daniil Ostapenkov
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Teimuraz Gabashvili
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Faris Zakaryia
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
7
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Norbert Marosik
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
52
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Hrazdil
Player
Marlon Vankan
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
Player
Marlon Vankan
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Eero Vasa
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 3-6 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Artur Kukasian
67%
(
82 of
122)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
7
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
46%
(
56 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
107
Total Points Won
111
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Atakan Karahan
Player
Marlon Vankan
53%
(
47 of
89)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
99)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
91
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Smits Vs Vankan Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
